While the nation is busy commemorating the Battle of Sailor’s
Creek and Lee’s flight to Appomattox, today marks another, less famous
anniversary that is nonetheless extremely significant.
On April 6, 1865 – 150 years ago today – the Medal of Honor
was authorized for African American foot soldiers for the very first time in
American history (Sgt. William Carney of the 54th Massachusetts did
not receive his Medal of Honor for gallantry in the 1863 assault on Battery
Wagner until May of 1900).
The symbolic importance of what would become the nation’s
highest honor being awarded to a class of people whom the Supreme Court had just eight years earlier deemed unworthy of any
“rights which the white man was bound to respect” is truly astounding.
Furthermore, the number of medals issued on that day – twelve (two more would
follow in the postwar years) – is equally impressive.
All of these medals were issued for one momentous clash outside
the gates of Richmond – the Battle of New Market Heights, fought on September
29, 1864. This battle involved black soldiers from the Army of the James successfully
attacking a fortified position east of the Confederate capital.
Following the victory the Army of the James’s commanding
general, Maj. Gen. Benjamin F. Butler, forwarded a list of men he thought deserving
of the Medal of Honor to Lt. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant. The list was reviewed by
Grant’s staff and then sent along to the War Department. For months, the matter
was forgotten until finally, on April 6, 1865 the medals were issued to the
following soldiers (unit and citation included):
1.) Pvt. William H. Barnes, 38th USCT: “among the very first
to enter the rebel works, although himself previously wounded”
2.) 1st Sgt. Powhatan Beaty, 5th USCT: “in command, all
their company officers being killed or wounded, and led them gallantly and
meritoriously through the day”
3.) 1st Sgt. James Bronson, 5th USCT: "took command of his company, all the officers having been killed or wounded, and gallantly led it"
4.) Sgt. Maj. Christian Fleetwood, 4th USCT: “when
two color bearers had been shot down, seized the national colors and bore them
nobly through the fight”
5.) Pvt. James B. Gardiner, 36th USCT: “rushed in advance of
his brigade, shot at a rebel officer, who was on the parapet cheering his men,
and then ran him through with his bayonet”
6.) Sgt. Alfred Hilton (posthumously), 4th USCT: “the bearer
of the national colors, when the color-sergeant with the regimental standard
fell beside him, seized the standard, and struggled forward with both colors,
until disabled by a severe wound at the enemy's inner line of abatis, and when
on the ground he showed that his thoughts were for the colors and not for
himself”
7.) Sgt. Milton M. Holland, 5th USCT: "Took command of Company C, after all the officers had been killed or wounded, and gallantly led it"
8.) Cpl. Miles James, 36th USCT: “after having his arm so
badly mutilated that immediate amputation was necessary, loaded and discharged
his piece with one hand, and urged his men forward; this within thirty yards of
the enemy's works”
9.) 1st Sgt. Alexander Kelly, 6th USCT: “gallantly seized
the colors, which had fallen near the enemy's inner line of abatis, raised
them, and rallied the men at a time of confusion and a place of the greatest
possible danger”
10.) 1st Sgt. Robert Pinn, 5th USCT: “in command, all their
company officers being killed or wounded, and led them gallantly and
meritoriously through the day”
11.) 1st Sgt. Edward Ratcliff, 38th USCT: “thrown into
command of his company by the death of the officer commanding, was the first
enlisted man in the enemy's works, leading his company with great gallantry”
12.) Pvt. Charles Veal, 4th USCT: “after two bearers of the
regimental color had been shot down, seized it close to the enemy's works and
bore it through the remainder of the action”
Unfortunately, such a large number of medals being issued to
African American soldiers has been viewed by many historians as a form of what
I often refer to as “19th century affirmative action” – the fact
that these were black troops commanded by a boastful Butler has led many to conclude
that these medals were not anything special.
One historian referred to the victory at New Market Heights as
“hoopla…contrived by Butler and his partisans.” Another leading historian once
referred to the celebration of the black soldiers’ success as “militarily irrelevant
negrophelia” and bemoaned the “modern writers [who] have willingly and
uncritically accepted it.” (Needless to say, I offer a different take in my examination of the battle.)
Regardless of the position one might take on these matters,
the significance of 150 years ago today should not be overlooked, as it proved
that the march towards freedom, equality, and the full benefits of citizenship was
becoming a tangible reality.